Enovis Logo
change profile

Click the button below to go to the homepage and view the site as a Patient.

generic background for product detail page SMR cementless Revision Prosthesis

SMR Revision Stems

Balanced by Design


SMR Revision is a reliable, easy-to-use system for mild to severe bone loss cases. It also features dual Conicity tapered stems.

Evolved Modularity

Enovis is a true pioneer in the modularity field: SMR has been the first to address multiple indications of shoulder replacement with a unique modular system, and its options keeps evolving towards the future, extending indications and improving outcomes.

Reliable Fixation

SMR can provide multiple fixation strategies -cement, press-fit, TT bone ingrowth both on humerus and on glenoid side and they are all proved to be reliable.

Proven Performance

Proven results make SMR having one of the widest clinical heritage among all the shoulder replacements worldwide.

About

Using the clinically proven SMR System, an orthopedic surgeon can choose implants according to the evolvement of encountered pathologies, whether it is fracture hemi, total shoulder reverse shoulder or revision [1-8].

SMR Revision provides a series of long cemented and cementless stems to enable distal fixation in severe bone loss cases. The stems have a dual conicity to provide good press-fit in the humeral canal. The Large Resection System also supports orthopedic surgeons in case of severe bone loss. SMR Revision implants are compatible with SMR reverse or anatomical components, to achieve the optimal configuration according to the clinical situation.

[1] Castagna A, Delcogliano M, de Caro F, Ziveri G, Borroni M, Gumina S, Postacchini F, De Biase CF. Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1297-305.   [2] Kirsch JM, Khan M, Thornley P, Gichuru M, Freehill MT, Neviaser A, Moravek J, Miller BS, Bedi A. Platform shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):756-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Oct 16.  [3] Malhas AM, Granville-Chapman J, Robinson PM, Brookes-Fazakerley S, Walton M, Monga P, Bale S, Trail I. Reconstruction of the glenoid using autologous bone-graft and the SMR Axioma TT metal-backed prosthesis: the first 45 sequential cases at a minimum of two years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2018 Dec;100-B(12):1609-1617.   [4] Marco Martínez F, Patzer T, Petriccioli D, Viola EM, Lopiz Y, Bertone C, Marchi G, Rossi SMP, Bloch HR. Can modularity contribute in making shoulder arthroplasty revisions less demanding? In: Proceedings of the 26th Congress of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (SECEC–ESSSE); 2015 Sep 16-9; Milan, Italy.  [5] Merolla G, Wagner E, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Porcellini G. Revision of failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty to reverse total arthroplasty: analysis of 157 revision implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):75-81.   [6] Postacchini R, Castagna A, Borroni M, Cinotti G, Postacchini F, Gumina S. Total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1542-9.   [7] Weber-Spickschen S, Agneskirchner J. Clinical and radiological results after conversion from anatomic to reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a modular system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014) 22 (Suppl 1):S383.   [8] Weber-Spickschen TS, Alfke D, Agneskirchner JD. The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Clinical and radiological results. Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1662-7.

Sizing and Options

8 cementless stem sizes

6 cemented stem sizes

4 Large Resection Stem Sizes

4 Large Resection modular spacer sizes

Clinical Papers

Bitzer A, Rondinelli S, Hurwit DJ, Sonnenfeld JJ, Hong IS, Connor PM.

Conversion of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a unique hybrid glenoid component: technique and preliminary results.

JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2021;2(2):155–163.
Read the article
Makki D, Balbisi B, Arshad MS, Monga P, Bale S, Trail I, Walton M.

Assessing the required glenoid peg penetration in native scapula when bone graft is used during primary and revision shoulderarthroplasty.

Shoulder and Elbow. 2021;14(3):269.
Read the article
Malhas A, Rashid A, Copas D, Bale S, Trail I.

Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Shoulder Elbow. 2016 Oct;8(4):229-40.
Read the article
Merolla G, Wagner E, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Porcellini G.

Revision of failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty to reverse total arthroplasty: analysis of 157 revision implants.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):75-81.
Read the article
Weber-Spickschen TS, Alfke D, Agneskirchner JD.

The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J. 2015:97–1662.
Read the article

Product manufactured by Limacorporate S.p.A.

Please note that not all products are available and registered in every market. Please contact your Enovis’ Sales Representative for any further information.

Mathys Ltd Bettlach and Limacorporate S.p.A. are affiliates of Enovis Corporation.

Contact us

Get in touch with us by filling out the form below.